Cases 81 - 90 of 224
Richard Benish v. Robert Houston
as 11-3559
Petitioner - Appellant:
Richard L. Benish
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Thomas v. Houston
as 4:2011cv03161
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
L.T. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin v. Houston
as 8:2011cv00316
Defendant:
Robert Houston
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Lamont Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ebert v. Hargreaves et al
as 4:2011cv03139
Defendant:
Fred Britten, Kim Doht, Christina Ferguson and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ebert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
On v. Houston
as 8:2011cv00282
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Tri Q. On
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benish v. Houston
as 4:2011cv03109
Petitioner:
Richard L. Benish
Defendant:
Robert Houston
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Houston
as 8:2011cv00232
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Petitioner:
Johnny Fred Morgan, Jr.
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Philip Gibilisco v. Robert Houston
as 11-2360
Petitioner - Appellant:
Philip P. Gibilisco
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston
Kevin Smith v. Robert Bakewell, et al
as 11-2292
Petitioner - Appellant:
Kevin G. Smith
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Bakewell, Warden and Robert Houston, Director
Hunt v. Houston et al
as 4:2011cv03086
Defendant:
Dennis Bakewell, Daniel Danaher, John or Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
