Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Primus v. Sagdalen
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Carron Lee Primus
Defendant:
Unknown Sagdalen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Primus v. Frye
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Carron Lee Primus
Defendant:
C.O. Unknown Frye and Jackson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company v. Money et al
as 4:2023cv01571
Plaintiff:
Acuity A Mutual Insurance Company and Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jacquelynn J Money, Nicholas Carron, Leah Carron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Carron v. TLG 634 Grand LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00561
Plaintiff:
Matthew Carron
Defendant:
TLG 634 Grand LLC doing business as The Angad Arts Hotel and Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carron v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00183
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Nicole M. Carron
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams v. United States of America
as 4:2017cv00236
Petitioner:
Patrick Carron Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reppell et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01858
Plaintiff:
Brenda Reppell , Diana Abbate , Nancy Askew and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00051
Petitioner:
Patrick Carron Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00315
Petitioner:
Patrick Carron Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
