Cases 1 - 10 of 63
United States v. Pedro Lopez, Jr.
as 24-1131
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Pedro Cabrera Lopez, Jr., also known as Vampiro, also known as Pedro Lopez Cabrera, Jr.
Ackerman et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02686
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ackerman, Jorge Ibrain Adrian, Jose Dimas Alfaro and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Shawn Flowers-Bey v. Robert Webster, et al
as 23-1355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shawn Flowers-Bey
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Webster, Thomas Cabrera, Miguel Paniagua and others
Kono et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Casey Kono, David Velasquez, Jonathan Griffith and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Traylor v. Hennepin County Sheriffs Office et al
as 0:2022cv02788
Plaintiff:
Rayco Traylor
Defendant:
Hennepin County Sheriffs Office, Hennepin Health Care, Hennepin County Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
German Diaz v. Merrick B. Garland
as 22-2817
Petitioner:
German Cabrera Diaz
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Elias Disla Rodriguez et al v. Svihel et al
as 0:2022cv01462
Plaintiff:
Jose Elias Disla Rodriguez, Johnny Diaz Munoz, Cirilo Garcia Garcia and others
Defendant:
John J. Svihel and Svihel Vegetable Farm, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595 Civil Remedies: Human Trafficking
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
