Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Canaan Wildlife Preserve, et al v. Caruso Law Firm, P.C., et al
as 15-2499
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Canaan Wildlife Preserve, Inc. an Arkansas Corporation, Willena Herman, Billy C. Looney and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, an Oklahoma corporation, Chesapeake Operating, Inc. an Oklahoma corporation, Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. an Oklahoma corporation and others
Movant - Appellant:
Caruso Law Firm, P.C. and Smolen, Smolen, & Roytman, PLLC
Looney v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02108
Plaintiff:
Billy C. Looney , Goodwin & Herman Associates, LLC and Siloam Minerals, LLC
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Operating, Inc., Chesapeake Exploration, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Canaan Wildlife Preserve, Inc. et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv02064
Plaintiff:
Canaan Wildlife Preserve, Inc. , Fred Herman , Willena Herman and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation , Chesapeake Operating, Inc. , Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Parkison v. Halliburton Energy Services Inc et al
as 4:2011cv00265
Plaintiff:
Clinton Parkison
Defendant:
Halliburton Energy Services Inc , Chesapeake Energy Corporation , Chesapeake Operating Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vanoven v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv00158
Plaintiff:
Cherie Vanoven
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Energy Marketing Inc, Chesapeake Exploration LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Diamond K Corporation v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2009cv00453
Plaintiff:
Diamond K Corporation and Diamond K Corporation
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Arkansas Midstream Gas Services Corporation, Chesapeake Operating Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
