Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Davenell Ash v. Law Enforcement Agencies, et al
as 24-1853
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Law Enforcement Agencies, FBI, BCA, DHS, NSA, etc. and Duluth Police Department
Davenell Ash v. Duluth Police Dept., et al
as 24-1459
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Duluth Police Department and Minnesota State Patrol
Ash v. Law Enforcement Agencies et al
as 0:2023cv02860
Plaintiff:
Davenell L Ash
Defendant:
Law Enforcement Agencies and Duluth, MN Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Davenell L Ash
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Duluth Police Force, 12 Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Davenell L Ash
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Duluth Police Dept, Hibbing Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davenell Ash v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 22-3432
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Minnesota, Duluth Police Department, Hibbing Police Department and others
Ash v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2022cv02479
Plaintiff:
Davenell H Ash and Davenell L Ash
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Duluth Police Dept, Hibbing Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davenell Ash v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 21-2232
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Minnesota, Hibbing Police Department, Duluth Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Davenell L. Ash
Ash v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2021cv01143
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Lee Ann Gargano, Hibbing Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Davenell L Ash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ash v. Duluth Police Force
as 0:2017cv01461
Plaintiff:
Davenell L Ash
Defendant:
Duluth Police Force
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
