Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Eugene Jones-El v. David Webster, et al
as 12-2159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eugene Kenneth Jones-El
Defendant - Appellee:
David Webster, Dave Courm, Edward L. Ruppel and others
Wade v. Dormire et al
as 2:2011cv04249
Plaintiff:
Unzell Wade
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Denise Pack, Jason Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. Dormire et al
as 4:2011cv01516
Plaintiff:
Unzell Wade
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Denise Pack, Jason Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eugene Jones-El v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 11-2315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eugene Kenneth Jones-El
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Bill Galloway, Stewart Epps and others
Eugene Jones-El v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 10-2320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eugene Kenneth Jones-El
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Bill Galloway, Stewart Epps and others
Jones-El v. Webster et al
as 2:2010cv04058
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kenneth Jones-El
Defendant:
David Webster, Dave Courm, Edward L Ruppel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Straeten v. Potosi Correctional Center, et al
as 10-1571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy Straeten, Timothy Straeten, Timothy Straeten and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Potosi Correctional Center, Jefferson City Correctional Center, Larry Crawford and others
Eugene Jones-El v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 10-1316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eugene Kenneth Jones and Eugene Kenneth Jones-El
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Bill Galloway, Stewart Epps and others
Jones-El v. Dormire et al
as 2:2009cv04255
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kenneth Jones-El
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Billy Galloway, Stewart Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Straeten v. Potosi Correctional Center et al
as 2:2009cv04018
Plaintiff:
Timothy Straeten
Defendant:
Potosi Correctional Center, Jefferson City Correctional Center, Larry Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
