Cases 1 - 7 of 7
HCA-Information Technology & Services Inc v. Shiloh Health Services Inc et al
as 4:2012mc00012
Plaintiff:
HCA-Information Technology & Services Inc
Defendant:
Shiloh Health Services Inc and Medical Park Hospital
Garnishee:
Arvest Bank
HCA-Information Technology & Services, Inc. v. Shiloh Health Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2012mc09002
Plaintiff:
HCA-Information Technology & Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Shiloh Health Services, Inc. and Medical Park Hospital
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
HCA-Information Technology & Services, Inc. v. Shiloh Health Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2010mc00003
Plaintiff:
HCA-Information Technology & Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Shiloh Health Services, Inc. and Medical Park Hospital
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Bobo et al v. Umoh et al
as 4:2010cv04013
Plaintiff:
Jesse Bobo and Carolyn Bobo
Defendant:
Daniel F. Umoh and Medical Park Hospital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Ware v. Signature Medical Park Hospital, L.L.C.
as 4:2009cv04045
Plaintiff:
David Ware and David Ware
Defendant:
Signature Medical Park Hospital, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jesse Bobo, et al v. Dr. Daniel Umoh, et al
as 08-1339
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jesse Bobo and Carolyn Bobo
Defendant - Appellant:
Dr. Daniel F. Umoh, M.D.
Defendant:
Medical Park Hospital, LLC, Triad Hospitals, Inc., doing business as Medical Park Hospital, Signature Hospital, LLC, doing business as Medical Park Hospital and others
Jesse Bobo, et al v. Dr. Daniel Umoh, et al
as 08-8001
Plaintiff - Respondent:
Jesse Bobo and Carolyn Bobo
Defendant - Petitioner:
Dr. Daniel F. Umoh, M.D.
Defendant:
Medical Park Hospital, LLC, Triad Hospitals, Inc., doing business as Medical Park Hospital, Signature Hospital, LLC, doing business as Medical Park Hospital and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
