Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Michael Murphy v. Missouri Board of Probation, et al
as 15-1874
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Dunham Murphy
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Ellis McSwain, Chuck Prior and others
Defendant:
John Doe, (#1-99)
Michael Murphy v. Ellis McSwain, et al
as 14-1704
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Dunham Murphy
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Board Member/Employe John Doe, (# 1-99) and Board Member/Employe Jane Doe, (# 1-99)
Defendant - Appellee:
Ellis McSwain, Chuck Prior and Chuck Pryor
Murphy v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 2:2014cv04031
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunham Murphy
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Ellis McSwain, Chuck Prior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Murphy v. MO Bd. of Probation & Parole, et al
as 12-8011
Petitioner:
Michael Dunham Murphy
Respondent:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Ellis McSwain, Chuck Prior and others
:
Board Member/Employe John Doe, (# 1-99) and Board Member/Employe Jane Doe, (# 1-99)
Murphy v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 2:2011cv04027
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunham Murphy
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Ellis McSwain, Chuck Prior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansfield et al v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv04171
Plaintiff:
James Eric Mansfield, Michael Dunham Murphy, Bernie Farmer and others
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Doug Worsham, George Lombardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Murphy v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 08-2889
Petitioner - Appellant:
Michael Dunham Murphy
Respondent - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Missouri Board of Probation and Parole and Jeremiah (Jay) W. Nixon
Michael D. Murphy v. Michael Kemna, et al
as 06-2376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Dunham Murphy
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Kemna, George Lombardi, Gary B. Kempker and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
