Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Richard Carr v. EMC Mortgage, LLC, et al
as 13-6018
Debtor:
In re: Richard L. Carr
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard L. Carr and Richard L. Carr
Defendant - Appellee:
EMC Mortgage, LLC and Bank of America N.A., as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Certificateholders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2005-HE12 c/o EMC
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) et al v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv01841
Defendant:
Ally Financial Inc., Ally Bank, Ally Securities, LLC formerly known as Residential Funding Securities, LLC formerly known as Residential Funding Securities Corporation doing business as GMAC RFC Securities and others
Plaintiff:
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.), John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) Separate Account 6A, John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) Separate Account 131 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Walker et al v. HLB Mortgage Corp. et al
as 6:2011cv03544
Plaintiff:
Larry G. Walker and Lena M. Walker
Defendant:
HLB Mortgage Corp., BancorpSouth Bank , 6.8 Acres, More or Less, in Greene County, Missouri, Commonly Known as 4070 and/or 4090 N. Castle Oaks Blvd., Strafford, MO 65757 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mollenhauer et al v. Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation et al
as 0:2011cv02725
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mollenhauer and Christine Jones
Defendant:
Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation and EMC Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Derrick Howard v. Bank of America
as 11-2296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derrick D. Howard
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of America, N.A. as successor by merger to Lasalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Certificate Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities 1 LLC, Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2005-HE3 c/o EMC Mortgage Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
