Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Colleen Garot, et al v. County of San Diego, et al
as 23-55400
Plaintiff: COLLEEN GAROT and THOMAS RAINEY
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, WILLIAM D. GORE, STEVEN BLOCK and others
Not Yet Classified: LIBERTY HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
Cross Defendant: QUOC TRAN, Dr.; M.D., FRIEDRIKE VON LINTIG, Dr.; M.D., MICHAEL STEWART, Ph.D. and others
Anh Thai, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 23-55327
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANH TUYET THAI, DON DOAN and TOMMY NGUYEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: MOHAMMAD NASSIRI, DIEP THI NGUYEN, ANH VAN THAI and others
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WILLIAM VILLASENOR and DULCE SANCHEZ
Defendant: STATE AND/OR LOCAL AGENTS LADA and DOES, 1-10
Anh Thai, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 23-55326
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANH TUYET THAI, DON DOAN and TOMMY NGUYEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: MOHAMMAD NASSIRI, DIEP THI NGUYEN, ANH VAN THAI and others
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WILLIAM VILLASENOR and DULCE SANCHEZ
Defendant: STATE AND/OR LOCAL AGENTS LADA and DOES, 1-10
J. Aguirre, et al v. Alejandro Villanueva, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-55315
Plaintiff / Appellant: J. AGUIRRE, J. ROLDAN, J. STANLEY and others
Defendant / Appellee: ALEJANDRO VILLANUEVA, KATHRYN BARGER, JANICE HAHN and others
Mark Munoz, et al v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, et al
as 23-55302
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK MUNOZ, JAHLEELE STANLEY, JOSE CABRERA and others
Defendant / Appellee: SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ERIC TAYLOR, Presiding Judge and DOES, Ten Unknown Named Defendants 1-10
Mark Paschal v. City and County of San Francisco, et al
as 23-15370
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK A. PASCHAL
Defendant / Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE OF SHORT TERM RENTAL, DIEGO SANCHEZ, individually and others
Ryan Crownholm, et al v. Richard Moore, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-15138
Plaintiff / Appellant: RYAN CROWNHOLM and CROWN CAPITAL ADVENTURES, INC., a Delaware corporation, registered as a foreign corporation in California, DBA mysiteplan.com
Defendant / Appellee: RICHARD B. MOORE, in his Official Capacity as Executive Officer of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists, ROSSANA D'ANTONIO, in her Official Capacity as President of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists, MICHAEL HARTLEY, in his Official Capacity as Vice-President of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists and others
Ryan Crownholm, et al v. Richard Moore, et al
as 23-15093
Plaintiff / Appellant: RYAN CROWNHOLM and CROWN CAPITAL ADVENTURES, INC., a Delaware corporation, registered as a foreign corporation in California, DBA mysiteplan.com
Defendant / Appellee: RICHARD B. MOORE, in his Official Capacity as Executive Officer of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists, ROSSANA D'ANTONIO, in her Official Capacity as President of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists, MICHAEL HARTLEY, in his Official Capacity as Vice-President of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists and others
Gilda Ryan, et al v. County of Imperial, et al
as 23-55042
Plaintiff / Appellant: GILDA RYAN, JOSEPH RYAN and JOSEPH M. RYAN
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF IMPERIAL, GILBERT OTERO, mperial County District Attorney, RAYMOND LOERA, Imperial County Sheriff and others
Kim Rogers v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 22-16997
Plaintiff / Appellant: KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee: ROB BONTA, California Attorney General, JIM COOPER, Sacramento Sheriff, GUADALUPE SANCHEZ, Manager, California sex offender registry and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?