Cases 61 - 70 of 29,233
Michael Grant v. Ronald Broomfield
as 23-55605
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID GRANT
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD BROOMFIELD
Timothy Olmos v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 23-15892
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY PAUL OLMOS, named as Timothy Olmos, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L RYAN, named as Charles Ryan, RICHARD PRATT, MARK SHIPMAN and others
Bryce Jackson v. Stephen Welborn, et al
as 23-35412
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYCE JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN WELBORN, Officer, Clark County Jail, ROBERT HANKS, Officer, Clark County Jail, BRYAN EDMISTON, Officer, Clark County Jail and others
Mark Fregia v. P. Miranda, et al
as 23-15893
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY FREGIA
Defendant / Appellee:
P. A. MIRANDA, SAVAGE and RIDGE
Samuel Hughes v. USA
as 23-55592
Petitioner / Appellant:
SAMUEL TRELAWNEY HUGHES
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Angel Sanchez v. Teresa Cisneros
as 23-55490
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANGEL SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN TERESA CISNEROS
Dean Manes v. Jenkins, et al
as 23-55502
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEAN MANES
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JENKINS, individual, CAPTAIN SIEJA, individual, LIEUTENANT KALETA, individual and others
Tracey Godfrey v. Leroy Kirkegard, et al
as 23-35398
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRACEY GODFREY
Respondent / Appellee:
LEROY KIRKEGARD, TIMOTHY C. FOX and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA
Yoandy Morales v. Ben Guiterez, et al
as 23-15891
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YOANDY FERNANDEZ MORALES
Defendant / Appellee:
BEN GUITEREZ, LANDSMAN, Dr and DRASEN
Raul Arellano v. Guldseth, et al
as 23-55517
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
GULDSETH, Doctor, CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE, Health Care Provider to C.D.C.R., CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, In Charge of Wellbeing of Prisoner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
