Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Alfred Murphy v. Raymond Madden
as 23-55521
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALFRED MURPHY
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Azhar Lal v. USA, et al
as 22-16907
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AZHAR LAL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HENRY CATTO, JAMES BAKER and others
John Demos, Jr. v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 22-35988
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY INSLEE, Governor, LORI RAMSDELL-GILKEY, WAYNE TANAKA, Court Appointed Public Defender and others
Tommy Keeton v. Jeff Lynch, et al
as 22-16313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOMMY ROY KEETON
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF LYNCH, RILEGIL, MOORE and others
Jonathan Murphy v. Estella Derr, et al
as 22-15974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN D. MURPHY
Defendant / Appellee:
ESTELLA DERR, Warden, Ms., ROBL, Mr., LOPEZ, Ms. and others
Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. Unknown Party, et al
as 22-15819
Petitioner / Appellant:
ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA, JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. USA, et al
as 22-15790
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. Unknown Party, et al
as 22-15789
Petitioner / Appellant:
ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA, JUDICIAL BRANCH OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. Congress
as 22-15439
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CONGRESS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15179
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
