Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 662
McCarthy, et al. v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., et al.
as 23-3458
Plaintiff / Appellant: LISA MCCARTHY, MARY KATHERINE ARCELL, KEITH DEAN BRADT and others
Defendant / Appellee: INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, INC., INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE HOLDINGS, INC., ICE BENCHMARK ADMINISTRATION LIMITED and others
Defendant: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC and THE NORINCHUKIN BANK
Kelly McDougall, et al v. County of Ventura, et al
as 23-55754
Plaintiff / Appellant: KELLY ANN CHAKOV MCDOUGALL, an individual and as trustee, JULIANA GARCIA, an individual, SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION and others
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF VENTURA, BILL AYUB, WILLIAM T. FOLEY and others
Bill Gaede, et al v. Michael DeLay, et al
as 23-35531
Plaintiff / Appellant: BILL GAEDE and NILA GAEDE, husband and wife
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL DELAY, ANASTASIA BENDEBURY and BIOSPINTRONICS, LLC
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, et al v. Raul Labrador, et al
as 23-35518
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST, HAWAII, ALASKA, INDIANA, KENTUCKY, On Behalf of Itself, It's Staff, Physicians and Patients, CAITLIN GUSTAFSON, On Behalf of Herself and Her Patients and DARIN WEYHRICH, On Behalf of Himself and His Patients
Defendant / Appellant: RAUL R. LABRADOR, In His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Idaho
Defendant: MEMBERS OF THE IDAHO STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE, IDAHO STATE BOARD OF NURSING, In Their Official Capacities, COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS, In Their Official Capacities and others
Kari Lake, et al v. Bill Gates, et al
as 23-16022
Plaintiff: KARI LAKE and MARK FINCHEM
Appellant: ANDREW D. PARKER, PARKER DANIELS KIBORT, LLC, KURT B. OLSEN and others
Defendant / Appellee: BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, JACK SELLERS, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Defendant: ADRIAN FONTES, Arizona Secretary of State, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, REX SCOTT, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors and others
Kari Lake, et al v. Bill Gates, et al
as 23-16023
Plaintiff: KARI LAKE and MARK FINCHEM
Appellant: ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Counsel for Plaintiffs
Defendant / Appellee: BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, JACK SELLERS, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Defendant: ADRIAN FONTES, Arizona Secretary of State, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, REX SCOTT, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors and others
Raul Mendez v. ADA County, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-35488
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAUL MENDEZ
Defendant / Appellee: ADA COUNTY, ADA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ADA COUNTY TREASURER and others
Robert Billie v. County of Santa Barbara, et al
as 23-55554
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT LEE BILLIE
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, BILL BROWN, Sheriff of Santa Barbara County, individual and official capacity, BERNARD MELEKIAN, Under Sheriff of Santa Barbara County, individual and official capacity and others
Rosemary D'Augusta, et al v. American Petroleum Institute, et al
as 23-15878
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROSEMARY D'AUGUSTA, BRENDA DAVIS, PAMELA FAUST and others
Defendant / Appellee: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, CHEVRONTEXACO CAPITAL CORPORATION and others
Government App Solutions, Inc. v. City of New Haven, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-15708
Plaintiff / Appellant: GOVERNMENT APP SOLUTIONS, INC., a California corporation
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF NEW HAVEN, KEVIN M. JOHNSON, NICOLE WEST and others
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MICHAEL ANDERSON and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?