Cases 11 - 20 of 107
Maverick Gaming LLC v. USA, et al
as 23-35136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAVERICK GAMING LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
SHOALWATER BAY TRIBE
Amicus Curiae:
NON-PARTY COMPACTING TRIBES
Michael Couris, et al v. Kristina Lawson, et al
as 23-55069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL COURIS and MICHAEL FITZGIBBONS
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTINA D. LAWSON, in her official capacity as President of the Medical Board of California, WILLIAM J. PRASIFKA, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Medical Board of California and ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Intervenor:
LETRINH HOANG, D.O., PHYSICIANS FOR INFORMED CONSENT, a not for-profit organization and CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE, CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, a California Nonprofit Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE, COMPASSION & CHOICES, ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA and others
Aaron Senne, et al v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, et al
as 23-15004
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AARON SENNE, MICHAEL LIBERTO, OLIVER ODLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL and ALLAN HUBER SELIG
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAQUEL PITTS, Proposed Intervenor-Plaintiff
Mark McDonald, et al v. Kristina Lawson, et al
as 22-56220
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK MCDONALD and JEFF BARKE
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTINA D. LAWSON, in her official capacity as President of the Medical Board of California, RANDY W. HAWKINS, in his official capacity as Vice President of the Medical Board of California, LAURIE ROSE LUBIANO, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Medical Board of California and others
Intervenor:
LETRINH HOANG, D.O., PHYSICIANS FOR INFORMED CONSENT, a not for-profit organization and CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE, CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, a California Nonprofit Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE, COMPASSION & CHOICES, ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA and others
Wallen Lawson v. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc.
as 22-56114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLEN LAWSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES, INC.
Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mex, et al v. Anthony Earley, Jr., et al
as 22-16711
Not Classified By Court:
In re: PG&E CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO, The Class, YORK COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY OF YORK RETIREMENT FUND, CITY OF WARREN POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY F. EARLEY, Jr., GEISHA J. WILLIAMS, NICKOLAS STAVROPOULOS and others
Defendant:
PG&E CORPORATION
JD Bols, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 22-56006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JD BOLS and AMY MULLINS-BOYCHAK
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of California, TOMAS ARAGON, M.D., Dr. P.H., in his official capacities as the Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Public Health Officer, WILMA J. WOOTEN, M.D. M.P.H.in her official capacity as Medical Officer for the County of San Diego and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD GLORIA, In his official capacity as Mayor of San Diego
Andrew Moret v. Kate Brown, et al
as 22-35424
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BROWN, STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Icon Desert Logistics, et al v. City of Blythe, et al
as 22-55500
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ICON DESERT LOGISTICS, a California limited liability company, THOMAS LAWSON, Director, an individual, XIAOTONG LIU, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BLYTHE, a government entity, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a government entity, RUDY MORENO and others
USA v. LeShawn Lawson
as 22-10008
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LESHAWN LAWSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
