Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 358
In re: J. D. v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-16693
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC and others
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
J. D. v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-16695
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: JUUL LABS, INC.
Defendant: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PAX LABS, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. and others
Jane Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice, et al
as 22-35853
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee: LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, STATE OF LOUISIANA, CITY OF BATON ROUGE, and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Jane Doe v. USDC-ORPIn re: Jane Doe v. USDC-ORP
as 22-70230
Not Classified By Court: In re: JANE DOE, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Petitioner: JANE DOE
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Jane Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice, et al
as 22-35752
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee: LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT STATE OF LOUISIANA, CITY OF BATON ORGANIZATIONS ACT AND ROUGE AND PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE and others
Tommy Keeton v. Jeff Lynch, et al
as 22-16313
Plaintiff / Appellant: TOMMY ROY KEETON
Defendant / Appellee: JEFF LYNCH, RILEGIL, MOORE and others
Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. USDC-AZP
as 22-70180
Not Classified By Court: In re: ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, OFFICE OF THE STAFF ATTORNEYS FOR THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS and others
Petitioner: ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. USDC-AZP
as 22-70181
Not Classified By Court: In re: ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON and DIRECTOR OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS
Petitioner: ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Jane Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, et al
as 22-35572
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF BATON ROUGE, CITY OF BATON ROUGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES WEBER and others
In re: J. D., et al v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-80063
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Respondent: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant: PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC, JAMES MONSEES and others
Petitioner: JUUL LABS, INC.
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?