Cases 31 - 40 of 107
Sukhdev Gill v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-70877
Petitioner:
SUKHDEV SINGH GILL
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Balbir Gill v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-73243
Petitioner:
BALBIR SINGH GILL
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
USA v. Mark Gill
as 16-30217
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK DOUGLAS GILL
Vikram Gill v. Ikebal Gill, et al
as 16-56271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIKRAM GILL
Defendant - Appellee:
IKEBAL S. GILL
Defendant:
RANI B. GILL, GOVIND S. GILL and CUDDY & FEDER, LLP
Robert Mahoney, et al v. City of Seattle, et al
as 14-35970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MAHONEY, Officer, SJON C. STEVENS, Officer, CLIFF BORJESON, Officer and others
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SEATTLE, including the Seattle Police Department, the Seattle Police Monitor Team, and the Seattle Attorney's Office, ED MURRAY, individually and in his official capacity, Mayor, City of Seattle, PETER HOLMES, individually and in his official capacity, Seattle's City Attorney and others
Victor Thomas v. Audrey Gill
as 14-16802
Petitioner - Appellant:
VICTOR THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
AUDREY GILL
USA v. Jimmy Gill
as 14-10440
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JIMMY GILL, AKA Joselin Gil, AKA Joselin Jimelet Gil Sanchez, AKA Gilberto Sanchez
Donald Long v. Gordon Gill, et al
as 14-35669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD LONG
Defendant - Appellee:
GORDON GILL and LANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Jerry Lewis v. Jeffery Wang, et al
as 14-16392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERY WANG, M.D. (CMO)(A), CLARK, M.D. (CMO), C. SISODIA, P.A. and others
Rodney Butler v. Audrey Gill
as 14-15942
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY BUTLER
Respondent - Appellee:
AUDREY GILL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
