Cases 31 - 40 of 582
Lisa Belyew v. Mike Pallares, et al
as 23-15581
Petitioner / Appellant:
LISA MARIE BELYEW
Respondent / Appellee:
MIKE PALLARES, Warden
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Kenneth Hutt v. The People of the State of California
as 23-70050
Petitioner:
KENNETH SHERWOOD HUTT
Respondent:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Clifton Williams, Jr. v. People of the State of California, et al
as 23-15454
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLIFTON WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF STANISLAUS DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, P. HOGAN and others
The People of the State of California v. Abanoob Abdel-Malak
as 23-55222
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant / Appellant:
ABANOOB ABDEL-MALAK
Ivin Mood v. City of Newport Beach, et al
as 23-55103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IVIN MOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Dwayne Burgess v. People of the State of California
as 23-15134
Petitioner / Appellant:
DWAYNE LAMONT BURGESS
Respondent / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Kevin Hickman v. People of the State of California
as 23-15117
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN DUANE HICKMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Ivin Mood v. USDC-CASA
as 22-70275
Not Classified By Court:
In re: IVIN MOOD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA ANA, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH and others
Petitioner:
IVIN MOOD
Vicente Rodriguez v. Jeff Lynch, et al
as 22-16876
Petitioner / Appellant:
VICENTE PRADO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFF LYNCH, Warden and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Robert Pope v. People of the State of California, et al
as 22-56112
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT POPE
Respondent / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and WARREN C. MONTGOMERY, Party of Interest
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
