Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Earnest Woods, II v. Kevin Chappell, et al
as 13-55974
Petitioner - Appellant: EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Respondent - Appellee: KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden and KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
Earnest Woods, II v. Ben Curry, et al
as 13-16045
Plaintiff - Appellant: EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Defendant - Appellee: BEN CURRY, N. GRANNIS, AUNG and others
Brenda Moore v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al
as 13-55873
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRENDA MOORE
Defendant - Appellee: WAL-MART STORES, INC., PEPSI COMPANY INC., SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SMALL CLAIMS DEPARTMENT 11 and others
Arthur Harris, et al v. Los Angeles Department of Chil, et al
as 13-55686
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARTHUR G. HARRIS and ERICA BROWN
Defendant - Appellee: LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, TERESA LEE, Social Worker, HERMAN PERRAULT, Social Worker and others
Earnest Harris v. R. Lewi
as 13-15765
Petitioner - Appellant: EARNEST S. HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee: R. LEWIS, Warden
Earnest Woods, II v. Kevin Chappell, et al
as 13-55326
Petitioner - Appellant: EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Respondent - Appellee: KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden and KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
Earnest Woods, II v. Tom Carey, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-15248
Plaintiff - Appellant: EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Defendant - Appellee: TOM L. CAREY and CERVANTES, Appeals Coordinator
Earnest Harris v. Director, California Depart.
as 12-72062
Petitioner: EARNEST S. HARRIS
Respondent: DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Earnest Woods, II v. John Marshall
as 12-55771
Plaintiff - Appellant: EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN MARSHALL, Warden
Earnest Woods, II v. Tom Carey, et al
as 12-15444
Plaintiff - Appellant: EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Defendant - Appellee: TOM L. CAREY, D. R. JOHNS, CERVANTES, Appeals Coordinator and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?