Cases 41 - 50 of 579
Bruce Creamer v. The People of the State of California
as 22-70244
Petitioner:
BRUCE WARREN CREAMER
Respondent:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16606
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clifton Williams, Jr. v. People of the State of California, et al
as 22-16420
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLIFTON WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PATRICK HOGAN, District Attorney and JESSICA DAVIES, Modesto Police Officer, County of Stanislaus
Richard Hawks v. Todd Billeci
as 22-16296
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD HAWKS
Respondent / Appellee:
TODD BILLECI, County Probation Officer, Contra Costa County
Not Classified By Court:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Clifton Williams, Jr. v. People of the State of California, et al
as 22-16293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLIFTON WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, P. HOGAN, District Attorney and others
Camran Mohammed v. People of the State of California
as 22-70164
Petitioner:
CAMRAN ABBAS MOHAMMED
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
People of the State of California v. Jacquelyn Miller
as 22-55730
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant / Appellant:
JACQUELYN MILLER
Ramon Lupercio v. People of the State of California, et al
as 22-16127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMON NAVARRO LUPERCIO
Defendant / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MARK LOPEZ, Detective, JOHN P. MORAN and others
Clifton Williams, Jr. v. People of the State of California, et al
as 22-15894
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLIFTON WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF STANISLAUS and DAWNA F. REEVES, Superior Court Judge
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15651
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
