Cases 41 - 50 of 542
Camran Mohammed v. People of the State of California
as 22-70164
Petitioner:
CAMRAN ABBAS MOHAMMED
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Ramon Lupercio v. People of the State of California, et al
as 22-16127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMON NAVARRO LUPERCIO
Defendant / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MARK LOPEZ, Detective, JOHN P. MORAN and others
Clifton Williams, Jr. v. People of the State of California, et al
as 22-15894
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLIFTON WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF STANISLAUS and DAWNA F. REEVES, Superior Court Judge
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15651
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Elwood Hayes, II v. The People of the State of California
as 22-70076
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ELWOOD DUANE HAYES II
Petitioner:
ELWOOD DUANE HAYES II
Respondent:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Rod Huff v. People of the State of California
as 22-70059
Petitioner:
ROD ANTHONY HUFF
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Isaiah Ramirez, Sr. v. People of the State of Califor
as 22-70028
Petitioner:
ISAIAH BENITO RAMIREZ, Sr.
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Moses Clark v. Heather Shirley, et al
as 22-55188
Petitioner / Appellant:
MOSES CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
HEATHER SHIRLEY and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Jason Beasley v. Christian Pfeiffer, et al
as 21-17080
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASON BEASLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Shell Energy North America (US v. FERC
as 21-71418
Petitioner:
SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA (US), L.P.
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Intervenor:
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Rob Bonta Attorney General, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
