Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Kristi Durschmidt v. The Inspector General
as 11-70846
Petitioner:
KRISTI LEE DURSCHMIDT
Respondent:
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
Kitrich Powell v. James Gibbons, et al
as 10-17498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KITRICH A. POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES GIBBONS, ROSS MILLER, CATHERINE CORTEZ-MASTO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-17046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daniel Carpenter v. State of California, et al
as 10-15566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL J. CARPENTER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADULT & YOUTH CORRECTIONAL AGENCY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Shadale Williams v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-17300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHADALE L. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor, in his individual capacity, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, Official Capacity, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, Official Capacity and others
Robert King, Jr. v. Joe Capps, et al
as 09-35304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HADEN KING, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE E. CAPPS, Inspector III, RON MYERS, Hearings Officer, WADE SCROGHAM, Hearings Administrator and others
Charles Chatman v. Richard Early, et al
as 09-15683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES JAMES CHATMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD EARLY, Regional Administrator, JOHN CHEN, Chief Deputy Inspector General, M. MONTEIRO, Associate Warden and others
David Arisman v. J. Woodford, et al
as 09-15637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID W. ARISMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. S. WOODFORD, Warden, GRAY DAVIS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Nick Kolev v. Rabbi Davidi, et al
as 08-56790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICK A. KOLEV, P.E. Ph.D.
Defendant:
RABBI NISSIM DAVIDI, Administrator Rabbinical Council of California (RCC), RABBI MENACHEM GENACK, Rabbinic Administr Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations (OU), THOMAS N. LEDVINA, Associate GC Office of the General Counsel and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
