Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,089
Lemus De Leon v. Garland
as 23-1131
Petitioner: EDGAR ALEXANDER LEMUS DE LEON
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Martinez
as 23-1125
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: FRANKLIN ALEXANDER MARTINEZ
Aguilar Reyes v. Garland
as 23-1089
Petitioner: EDWIN ALEXANDER AGUILAR REYES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Louis Peets v. Jerry Brown, Jr., et al
as 23-15811
Plaintiff / Appellant: LOUIS IVESTER PEETS
Defendant / Appellee: JERRY BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Director of CDCR's Adult Institutions and others
Matthew Houston v. L.B.B.S., et al
as 23-15810
Plaintiff / Appellant: MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee: L.B.B.S., Termed by ECF No. 5, DANIEL SCHWARTZ, CALVIN JOHNSON and others
Hernadez-Ichel v. Garland
as 23-993
Petitioner: MELVIN ALEXANDER HERNADEZ-ICHEL
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Andrew Durkin, et al v. Herman Alexander
as 23-15733
Plaintiff / Appellee: ANDREW P. DURKIN and ALICE P. DURKIN
Defendant / Appellant: HERMAN ALEXANDER
Gary Alexander v. CIR
as 23-70075
Petitioner / Appellant: GARY W. ALEXANDER
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Katherine Hoot v. USA, et al
as 23-35326
Plaintiff / Appellant: KATHERINE J. HOOT, Personal Representative of the Estate of Alexander T Aneiro (Deceased)
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, MANN-GRANDSTAFF VA MEDICAL CENTER and others
Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard, et al
as 23-15567
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL COBB
Defendant / Appellee: CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex warden at USP-Tucson, K WERNER, SOMP Coordinator/ Psychologist at USP-Tucson, L UNRUH-PARKER, SOMP Psychologist at USP-Tucson and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?