Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ronald Buzzard, Jr. v. State of Washington, et al
as 22-35466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD BUZZARD, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY PROSECUTOR, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Ashenafi Aberha v. Eric Delafontaine, et al
as 22-15282
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ASHENAFI G. ABERHA
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC DELAFONTAINE
Defendant:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DIRECTOR, Nevada Department of Corrections, W. GITTERRE and others
Ronald Buzzard, Jr. v. State of Washington, et al
as 21-35952
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD BUZZARD, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY, Prosecutor, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Jamal Hendrix v. M. Sharp, et al
as 21-15358
Defendant / Appellee:
ELLIOT BURLEIGH, H. CHUNG, C. DAVIS, Sgt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX, AKA Jamar Hendrix
Charles Davis v. A. Molina, et al
as 19-17411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES T. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, A. MOLINA and S. HOSMAN
Charles Davis v. Clark Kelso, et al
as 12-15018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES T. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK J. KELSO, Receiver, JAMES A. YATES, Warden, MATTHEW CATE, Secretary and others
Charles Davis v. Clark Kelso, et al
as 11-16469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES T. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK J. KELSO, Receiver, JAMES A. YATES, Warden, MATTHEW CATE, Secretary and others
Charles Davis v. Ronald George
as 11-15759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES T. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD GEORGE, Chief Justice
Charles Davis v. USDC-CAFR
as 11-70399
:
In re: CHARLES T. DAVIS
Petitioner:
CHARLES T. DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
RONALD GEORGE, Chief Justice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
