Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Muhammad Akbar, Sr. v. U.S. Parole Commission, et al
as 21-55771
Petitioner / Appellant:
MUHAMMAD JALAL-DEEN AKBAR, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and JENKINS, Warden
Clinton Eldridge v. Barbara von Blanckensee, et al
as 21-15616
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLINTON T. ELDRIDGE
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, Acting Chairman of the U.S. Parole Commission and BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE
Harun Ghaffar v. U.S. Parole Commission, et al
as 17-55590
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARUN A. GHAFFAR, FKA Aaron C. Kelly
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and RICHARD B. IVES, Warden
Margaret Mable v. United States District Court f, et al
as 16-36080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARET MABLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Brandon Burnside v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 14-71360
Petitioner:
BRANDON LEE BURNSIDE
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Rodney Browning v. USDC-CALA
as 14-70475
:
In re: RODNEY BROWNING
Petitioner:
RODNEY BROWNING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
RICHARD IVES and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Darryl Smith v. Linda McGrew, et al
as 14-55011
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL J. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
LINDA T. MCGREW and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Daniel Mellinger v. Philip Guttierrez, et al
as 12-57045
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL MELLINGER
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILIP GUTTIERREZ and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Tyrone Hunt v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 12-16707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Lee Moore v. USPC, et al
as 10-56658
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEE ALPHONSO MOORE
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and J. L. NORWOOD, Complex Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
