Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Richard Harrison v. USA, et al
as 22-15038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD C. HARRISON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, A. ASH, USP Medical - Doctor, USP Tucson, DE GUZMAN, First name unknown, USP Medical - Doctor, USP Tucson and others
John Larsgard v. David Straub, et al
as 19-15762
Defendant:
FRENCH, BARTUCCIO, MULCAHEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
C. STANGL, Corrections Officer III, T. SCHROEDER, ANNA JACOBS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN KRISTOFFER LARSGARD
John Scannell v. Washington State Bar Assoc., et al
as 19-35203
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY E. FAIRHURST, Administrative Law Judge, DEBRA L. STEPHENS, MARY I. YU, in their official and administrative capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN R. SCANNELL, Esquire, AKA Zamboni
Juan Bribiesca v. Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves, an, et al
as 17-55098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN BRIBIESCA, M.D., C.C.P
Defendant - Appellee:
PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES, AND SAVITCH, LLP, a professional corporation, TIMOTHY SALTER, an individual, PAUL ANDREW TYRELL, an individual and others
Juan Bribiesca v. Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves, an, et al
as 17-55098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN M. BRIBIESCA, M.D., C.C.P
Defendant / Appellee:
PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES, AND SAVITCH, LLP, a professional corporation, TIMOTHY SALTER, an individual, PAUL ANDREW TYRELL, an individual and others
Dan Goodrick v. Terema Carlin, et al
as 13-35923
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN GOODRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
TEREMA CARLIN, GALE MUNDEN, AMY ANDERSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-35825
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Larsgard v. David Straub, et al
as 13-16784
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN KRISTOFFER LARSGARD
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID STRAUB, Corrections Officer III, UNKNOWN MULCAHEY, Corrections Officer III, C. STANGL, Corrections Officer III and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
