Cases 91 - 100 of 283
Seavon Pierce v. The U.S. Government et al
as 2:2016cv08010
Defendant:
Pierce V. Gonzales, Attorney General Kamala D. Harris, President Barack Obama and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Seavon Pierce et al v. John E. McDermott
as 2:2016cv07554
Plaintiff:
A.C.L.U., Human Rights Watch, L.A. Times Newspaper and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Federal Judicial Commission, Julie L. Garland and others
Seavon Pierce v. The U.S. Government et al
as 2:2016cv07556
Defendant:
Attorney General Kamala Harris, The California Department Corrections, The U.S. Government and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Seavon Pierce v. United States Congress et al
as 2:2016cv07301
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Federal Judicial Commission, Federal Judicial Commission State Capitol and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Justin T. Wagner v. Nantkwest, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06703
Defendant:
Michael D. Blaszyk, Cambridge Equities LP, Citigroup Global Markets Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Justin T. Wagner
Kenneth Frye v. Nantkwest, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06700
Defendant:
Michael D. Blaszyk, Cambridge Equities LP, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Frye
Craig Wiencek v. Nantkwest, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06705
Defendant:
Michael D. Blaszyk, Cambridge Equities LP, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Wiencek
Michael Hare et al v. Nantkwest, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06697
Defendant:
Michael D. Blaszyk, Cambridge Equities LP, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hare and Norman Jacobs
Seavon Pierce et al v. United States Congress et al
as 2:2016cv06332
Defendant:
Attorney General Kamala Harris, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Federal Judcial Commission State Capitol and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06246
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
