Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carl Abner et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05005
Plaintiff:
Carl Abner, Donna Adair, Jason Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ashley Blackmon v. City of Beverly Hills et al
as 2:2021cv08381
Plaintiff:
Ashley Blackmon
Defendant:
City of Beverly Hills, Beverly Hills Police Sergeant Kevin Orth, James Keenaghan and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Amy Semmel and Richard Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Debra Ann Blackmon v. Vernon Healthcare Center, et al
as 2:2021cv05608
Plaintiff:
Debra Ann Blackmon
Defendant:
Vernon Healthcare Center, LLC, ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES LLC, Brius Management Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Philip Prolo v. Diamonte Blackmon et al
as 2:2021cv05118
Defendant:
Medium Rare Live, LLC, Diamante Blackmon, Medium Rare, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Prolo
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Cynthia Wilson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05939
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson and Johnson Services, Inc., Johnson and Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Blackmon and Cynthia D Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Steve Blackmon v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2016cv04936
Plaintiff:
Steve Blackmon
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Joseph D Addison, III v. California Institution For Men et al
as 5:2015cv01259
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Addison, III
Defendant:
Shereef Aref, Shereef Aref, Christopher Blackmon and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv08956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
