Cases 1 - 10 of 10
(PS) Humphrey v. Modesto Police Department
as 2:2024cv01127
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
Modesto Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Humphrey v. California Highway Patrol
as 1:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Malaivanh v. Humphreys College et al
as 2:2016cv01081
Plaintiff:
Leanna Malaivanh
Defendant:
Humphreys College, Jesse De La Cruz and JSD Consultations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Humphrey v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01792
Plaintiff:
Andy Humphrey
Defendant:
United Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dean, et al v. Sacramento County, et al
as 2:2013at00383
Plaintiff:
Dennis Dean, Sr. , Susannah Hardesty and Dennis Dean, Jr.
Defendant:
Sacramento County, Scott Jones and Amy Humphreys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dean, et al v. Sacramento County, et al
as 2:2013cv00730
Plaintiff:
Dennis Dean, Sr. and Susannah Hardesty
Defendant:
Sacramento County , Scott Jones and Amy Humphreys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013at00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
