Cases 91 - 100 of 123,198
United States of America v. Tavena
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mary Tavena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Estate of Derrick Austin et al v. Kern County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Estate of Derrick Austin, Lillie Wolfe and James Ledford
Defendant:
Kern County Sheriffs Office, Kern County, Donny Youngblood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv01542
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Marcus Johnson, Luis Gonzalez, Richard Montes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Bolin v. Newcomb et al
as 2:2024cv01534
Petitioner:
Paul C. Bolin
Respondent:
Rachael Newcomb and T. Falkenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Ramsom v. Lucy et al
as 2:2024cv01535
Plaintiff:
Donshea Lavon Ramsom
Defendant:
Lucy, Phipps and Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Bonilla v. County of Inyo
as 2:2024cv01545
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
County of Inyo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Bonilla v. County of Monterey
as 2:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
County of Monterey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Bonilla v. County of Inyo
as 2:2024cv01547
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
County of Inyo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01558
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
