Cases 1 - 10 of 475
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
(HC) Robinson v. Pettijohn
as 1:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
Gareth Warren Robinson
Respondent:
Lindy Pettijohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
(PC) Payton v. Robinson et al
as 2:2024cv00961
Plaintiff:
Norbert Maurice Payton
Defendant:
H. Robinson, C. Cabatic, D. Tabbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
(PS) Robinson v. Bettencourt et al
as 2:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Rose A. Robinson
Defendant:
Dennis Bettencourt, Costal Capital Private Lender & Investments and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
(PC) Mayes v. Mule Creek State Prison Warden et al
as 2:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Stedvieno D'Barge Mayes
Defendant:
Mule Creek State Prison Warden, Tony Moua, C. Elston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mayes v. Mule Creek State Prison Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Stedvieno D'Barge Mayes
Defendant:
Mule Creek State Prison Warden, Tony Moua, C. Elston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
