Cases 1 - 10 of 1,376
(PC) Nitkin v. Clark et al
as 2:2024cv02233
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Nitkin
Defendant:
Keith Rodgers, Romero and Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2024cv02135
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vivi Stafford MD v. Department State Hospitals et al
as 1:2024cv00748
Defendant:
Department State Hospitals, Lori Clark and Brandon Price
Plaintiff:
Vivi Stafford, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Clark v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00720
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Sacramento Parole Department, Sacramento Probation Department and others
Plaintiff:
Andre James Clark, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Clark v. CDC, et al
as 2:2024cv01748
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Woodland Probation Department, Sacramento Probation Department and others
Plaintiff:
Andre James Clark, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01619
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2024cv01627
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2024cv01390
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
(PC) Clem v. Clark
as 2:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Terrill Keith Clem
Defendant:
S. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
