Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv09253
Plaintiff:
Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Amicus Curiae:
Members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Kids in Need of Defense, Immigration Law Professors and others
Petitioner:
Immigration Equality
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv07721
Defendant:
Mark A Morgan, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham and others
Plaintiff:
Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services and others
Petitioner:
Immigration Equality
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Legal Services Organizations and Immigration Law Professors
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
The Regents of the University of California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2020cv04621
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew Albence, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
The Regents of the University of California
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2020cv04592
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew Albence, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
State of California
Not Classified By Court:
The Regents of the University of California
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
International Technological University Foundation v. Nielsen et al
as 5:2018cv06228
Defendant:
Kirstjen M Nielsen, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) and others
Plaintiff:
International Technological University Foundation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
