Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Turner
as 3:2024cv01875
Plaintiff:
Anthony K. Turner
Defendant:
Yolo County (Mayor), CDCR Director, Warden Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Murphy-Richardson v. District of Arizona et al
as 3:2022cv09051
Petitioner:
Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Respondent:
District of Arizona, Douglas L. Rayes, Roslyn O. Silver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Guevara v. Bernson et al
as 3:2022cv08919
Petitioner:
Michael Guevara
Defendant:
Bernson and D. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guevara v. Richardson
as 5:2022cv04759
Plaintiff:
Michael Guevara
Defendant:
D. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bolanos et al
as 3:2022cv02697
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Carlos G. Bolanos, John W. Munsey, John Kovach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Richardson et al
as 4:2022cv01446
Plaintiff:
Marcel E. Chapman
Defendant:
Doug Richardson and San Mateo County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lum v. Bolanos et al
as 4:2022cv00774
Plaintiff:
Devin Lum
Defendant:
Carlos G. Bolanos, Mark C. Robbins, John W. Munsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. Bolanos et al
as 3:2022cv00770
Plaintiff:
Sirvontre Ingram
Defendant:
Carlos G. Bolanos, Mark C. Robbins, John W. Munsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollis v. Bolanos et al
as 3:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Tavijar Hollis
Defendant:
Carlos G. Bolanos, Mark C. Robbins, John W. Munsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
