Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Adams v. Robertson et al
as 4:2024cv05053
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams and Rooster
Defendant:
PhD Caitlin Robertson and Sarah Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Scott v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv05088
Plaintiff:
Milton Scott
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center and Jane and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Wilkinson et al v. Rodgers et al
as 1:2023cv03035
Plaintiff:
Richard Wilkinson, Ryan Cole and Richard Eggleston
Defendant:
Scott Rodgers, Aldon W Roberts, Anjali D'Souza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brueske et al v. Chelan County
as 2:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Scott Brueske and Cathleen Brueske
Defendant:
Chelan County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clervrain et al v. Heimlich et al
as 2:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Cobbina Osei-Fosu and Brandako Inc
Defendant:
Caleb Heimlich, Olga Farnam, Marlene Pfeifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv05148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
