Cases 101 - 110 of 3,776
Brabrook v. CDM Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Caroline Brabrook
Defendant:
CDM Smith, Douglas Lavoie, Daniel Manojlovski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rindal v. Dixon et al
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Steven Rindal and Steven Michael Rindal
Defendant:
Roman S Dixon, Steve Aust, Washington State Department of Health doing business as Chiropractic Quality Assurance Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Card v. Tacoma Municipal Court et al
as 3:2024cv05007
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Tacoma Municipal Court, All City Bail Bonds, Jonathan Lack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. Christel et al
as 3:2024cv05005
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
David W Christel, Tiffany M Cartwright and Grady J Leupold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Annu El v. Sea Mar Kent Medical Clinic
as 2:2023cv02007
Plaintiff:
Zebelum Anna El, Zebelum Willis and Zebelum Annu El
Defendant:
Sea Mar Kent Medical Clinic and Sandy Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vick v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2023cv06197
Plaintiff:
John E Vick
Defendant:
Tony Hernandez, Alexandria Hunter, Keanu Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mikanda v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
Neyembo Mikanda
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. Leupold
as 3:2023cv06152
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Grady J Leupold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fox v. Couch
as 2:2023cv01980
Plaintiff:
Glynndeavin Fox
Defendant:
Rogers Couch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Contract
Fox v. Mellette et al
as 2:2023cv01952
Plaintiff:
Glynndeavin Fox
Defendant:
Mellette and Charleston Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
