Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Littlefield v. Strange et al
as 2:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tyler Littlefield
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Michelle Duncan, Jason Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. State Judges et al
as 3:2023cv05373
Plaintiff:
Jerry T Richardson
Defendant:
State Judges, Pierce County, Joe Murry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin-Richardson v. King County Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Preston Eugene Martin-Richardson
Defendant:
King County Correctional Facility, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Childs v. Richardson
as 2:2021cv01390
Petitioner:
Robert Joe Childs, Jr
Respondent:
Kristin Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Holbrook
as 3:2020cv05178
Petitioner:
John Arthur Richardson
Respondent:
State of Washington and Donald R Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Haynes et al
as 3:2019cv05698
Defendant:
Lysted, Harrington, Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Marid Lamont Harris and Mario Lamont Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Gilbert et al
as 3:2019cv05525
Defendant:
Shane Evans, Margaret Gilbert, Individual Medical Staff and others
Plaintiff:
John A Richardson, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. King County Corrections Facility et al
as 2:2019cv00456
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Patnam, Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Preston Eugene Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert et al v. Sinclair
as 3:2018cv06040
Defendant:
Stephen Sinclair
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Alston, Syeve J Richardson, Kevin A Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Cowlitz County et al
as 3:2015cv05074
Plaintiff:
Roddy E. Avery
Defendant:
Cowlitz County , Marin Fox Hight , Blain Lux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
