Cases 81 - 90 of 235
Hebbe et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00380
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc and Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft
Plaintiff:
Herman Hebbe , Agatha Hebbe , Steven Emert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Miscellaneous Security Trust Fund v. Freeman Decorating Co.
as 2:2017cv09108
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Miscellaneous Security Trust Fund
Defendant:
Freeman Decorating Co.
Patrick Paul James Freeman v. Ruhnke et al
as 2:2017cv08889
Defendant:
Charlton, Kwon, Kwon and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Paul James Freeman
Richard Wayne Hughley v. F. Ulloa et al
as 2:2017cv08516
Defendant:
D. Avalos, J. Daiz, C. Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Hughley
Julie C. Fletcher Freeman v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv02065
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Julie C. Fletcher Freeman
Freeman v. National Credit Systems Inc
as 2:2017cv00332
Defendant:
National Credit Systems Inc
Plaintiff:
Daniel Freeman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Rubye Taylor, et al v. James B. Nutter and Company, et al
as 17-60066
Debtor:
In re: RUBYE E. TAYLOR
Appellant:
JAMES B. NUTTER AND COMPANY, JAMES B. NUTTER and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Appellee:
RUBYE E. TAYLOR, ANDRE DEL MONTE FREEMAN and MATTHEW D. RESNIK
Arpino v. Cherry et al
as 2:2017cv02266
Petitioner:
John Francis Arpino
Respondent:
Judge Janet J Berry, Chief Justice Michael A Cherry, Nathan Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Ali Sharifi v. One Stop Eviction Collections, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03808
Defendant:
Andre Freeman and One Stop Eviction Collections, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ali Sharifi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mehdi Mashemi v. Kevin Auther Freeman et al
as 2:2017cv05939
Defendant:
Does and Kevin Auther Freeman
Plaintiff:
Mehdi Hashemi
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
