Cases 1 - 10 of 2,440
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Schmidt v. United States District Court for the Central District of California
as 24-3617
Petitioner:
KORIE SCHMIDT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Interested Party:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Beck v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al.
as 24-3565
Plaintiff:
JOEL BECK
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, doing business as Mr. Cooper, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Securitized Trust Structured and FIRST AMERICAN TRUSTEE SERVICING SOLUTIONS, LLC
Korie Schmidt v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 2:2024cv04660
Plaintiff:
Korie Schmidt
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Moore v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, et al.
as 24-3460
Plaintiff:
IVAN RENE MOORE
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, ASSET RELIANCE, INC. and others
Hall v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, et al.
as 24-3100
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, GO2BANK, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wiseman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 3:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
Natasha Wiseman
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
