Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Chan v. Abe et al
as 2:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Chik Chan
Defendant:
Atsushi Abe, Alan Campbell, Susan K Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Miller et al v. Quartzview, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller, The Original Sixteen to One Mine, Inc., Hugh Dan O'Neill III and others
Defendant:
Quartzview, Inc., Roger Haas, Simon P. Westbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Abrahms v. May et al
as 2:2020cv02060
Defendant:
John P Cahill, Gary M Metzger, Peter A Mehring and others
Plaintiff:
Simon Abrahms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cheekatamarla v. Sanborn et al
as 3:2019cv00563
Defendant:
Thomas W. Casey, Timothy Mayopoulos, Patricia McCord and others
Plaintiff:
Rajender Cheekatamarla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baron v. Sanborn et al
as 3:2018cv04391
Defendant:
Thomas W. Casey, Carrie L. Dolan, Patty Mccord and others
Plaintiff:
Riccardo Baron
Baron v. Sanborn et al
as 4:2018cv04391
Plaintiff:
Riccardo Baron
Defendant:
Scott Sanborn , Steve Allocca , Sameer Gulati and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Andre Rosowsky v. Darren R. Jamison et al
as 8:2017cv00698
Defendant:
Richard K. Atkinson, Jayme L. Brooks, Capstone Turbine Corp. and others
Interested Party:
Isaac Haber and Andrew Tuttle
Plaintiff:
Andre Rosowsky
Brandon Boll v. Darren R. Jamison, et al.
as 2:2016cv05282
Defendant:
Richard K. Atkinson, Jayme L. Brooks, Capstone Turbine Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Boll
Andrew Tuttle v. Richard Atkinson et al
as 2:2016cv05127
Defendant:
Richard Atkinson, Jayme Brooks, Capstone Turbine Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Tuttle
Stadnicki v. LaPlanche et al
as 3:2016cv03072
Defendant:
Renaud LaPlanche, Carrie L Dolan, Scott Sanborn and others
Plaintiff:
Bart Stadnicki
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
