Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Watson v. Providence St. Peter Hospital, et al
as 3:2012cv05352
Defendant:
Providence St. Peter Hospital , Jacqueline Imori, Mary E Mertens and others
Plaintiff:
Carroll Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Austin et al v. Life Partners Inc., et al
as 2:2011cv01767
Plaintiff:
Angela Austin, Joseph A. Bertolino, Pat Bertolino and others
Defendant:
Life Partners Holdings, Inc. and Life Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Franckowiak v. Leek et al
as 1:2010cv03103
Defendant:
Wendy Sanders Blakeslee, Cathy Ann Leek and Steven Williams Sanders
Plaintiff:
Laurie Franckowiak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Copy Doctor, Inc. et al v. Xerox Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv04213
Plaintiff:
Copy Doctor, Inc. and Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Does, James Hughes, Jule Limoli and others
Cape Fox Corporation et al v. Jackson et al
as 3:2010cv00080
Plaintiff:
Cape Fox Corporation , APM, LLC and 1CI
Defendant:
Craig Jackson , Townsend Jackson, Advanced Business Management Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sanders v. SP Sahara Development, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv01544
Plaintiff:
Steven Sanders
Defendant:
SP Sahara Development, LLC, First American Title Company of Nevada and First American Title Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Debra Carrigan v. Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sa, et al
as 08-15754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBRA CARRIGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ALVERSON TAYLOR MORTENSEN & SANDERS and ERVEN NELSON
Sander et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc.
as 3:2007cv01186
Plaintiff:
James P. Sander and Alexandra M. Shenas-Sander
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Amazon.com Inc v. Irby et al
as 2:2007cv00297
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com Inc and Amazon.com Inc
Defendant:
Treston Irby, Russell Neal and Marcus Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
