Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hicks Park LLP v. ING Bank FSB et al
as 2:2011cv07330
Defendant:
Does and ING Bank FSB
Plaintiff:
Hicks Park LLP
ING Bank, fsb v. Tze-Huey Wah
as 11-35214
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ING BANK, FSB
Defendant - Appellant:
TZE-HUEY WAH, individually and SHAUN LIU, individually
Steve Alkana v. ING Bank FSB et al
as 2:2010cv04079
Counter Defendant:
Michele Alkana and Steve Alkana
Plaintiff:
Steve Alkana
Defendant:
Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, Does and ING Bank FSB
Counter Claimant:
ING Bank FSB
ING Bank, fsb v. Alexander Nikolaychuk et al
as 2:2010cv01402
Defendant:
Larisa Ermolova, Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Kinecta Federal Credit Union and others
Plaintiff:
ING Bank, fsb
Ing Bank , fsb v. McLeod et al
as 2:2009cv01502
Plaintiff:
Ing Bank , fsb
Defendant:
Anthony McLeod, Terri McLeod, America West Financial LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
ING Bank, fsb v. Wah et al
as 2:2009cv01458
Plaintiff:
ING Bank, fsb
Defendant:
Tze-Huey Wah, Shaun Liu, Tze-Huey Wah and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ING Bank, fsb v. Raymond S. Simmons et al
as 2:2009cv05240
Plaintiff:
ING Bank, fsb and ING Bank, fsb
Defendant:
Raymond S. Simmons, Michael Hutchinson and Contempo Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type:
Contract
ING Bank, FSB v. Phillips, et al
as 2:2009cv00753
Plaintiff:
ING Bank, FSB and ING Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Elizabeth L Phillips, Jeffrey M. Phillips, J & E Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ING Bank, FSB v. Morales, et al
as 2:2009cv00749
Plaintiff:
ING Bank, FSB and ING Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Magdiel C. Morales and Virginia Morales
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ING Bank, FSB v. Mata, et al
as 2:2009cv00748
Plaintiff:
ING Bank, FSB and ING Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Gabriela Mata, Royal Financial Arizona Inc., Nicholas A Henkels and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
