Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hillman et al v. PacifiCorp
as 2:2021cv00848
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Smith, David A. Gordon, John Bankston and others
Defendant:
PacifiCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LaRrett et al v. Tetra Tech EC, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv03941
Defendant:
Emile Haddad, Tetra Tech, Inc., HPS1 Block 51 LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jewel Robinson and Sean LaRrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Wendall Kabutan, et al v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, et al
as 16-16838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WENDALL KABUTAN and WANDA KABUTAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, a DuPont Business and Iowa Corporation, GAY & ROBINSON, INC., a Hawaii corporation, ROBINSON FAMILY PARTNERS, a general partnership registered in Hawaii and others
Casey et al v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00655
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Casey , Charlotte Casey , Harry Ishihara and others
Defendant:
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. , Gay & Robinson, Inc. , Robinson Family Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Robinson et al v. USA
as 2:2011cv01227
Plaintiff:
Dennis Robinson , Spencer Robinson, Jr. , Ricke Robinson and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Christian et al v. BP Amoco Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv00045
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Christian, Gregory A. Christian, Gregory A. Christian and others
Defendant:
BP Amoco Corporation, BP Corporation North America, Inc., BP AMERICAN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community et al v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2008cv01005
Plaintiff:
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Samuel Bodman and Timothy J. Meeks
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
