Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Taylor v. United Parcel Service Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
rachel taylor, aaron krache and Rachael Taylor
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc., oleg Hodgkinson and Oleg Romanyuk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Spangler v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01454
Plaintiff:
Nicole Spangler
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., United Parcel Service Co. and United Parcel Service General Services CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Pecchenino, et al. v. Britt, et al,
as 1:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Treasea Pecchenino and Amy Convington
Defendant:
Benjamin Britt, United Parcel Service, Inc., UPS Ground Freight, Inc.dba UPS Freight and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gately v. UPS, Inc., et al
as 2:2021cv00623
Defendant:
Maria Regina P Thunder, United Parcel Service, Inc.,, Maria Regina P. Thunder and others
Plaintiff:
Joan M Gately and Joan M. Gately
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gately v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al
as 2:2021at00320
Defendant:
Maria Regina P Thunder and United Parcel Service, Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Joan M Gately
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gwendolyn Wilson v. United Parcel Service, Inc et al
as 8:2020cv02028
Defendant:
The Realty Associates Fund X, L.P., UPS Ground Freight, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Wilson
Cross Defendant:
Prologis-Exchange 6545 Caballero Bld LLC, Realty Associates Fund X, L.P. and Roes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lopez v. Ortiz, et al.
as 2:2010cv01095
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Michael David Ortiz
Plaintiff:
Noe Benjamin Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foss v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01177
Plaintiff:
Charles Foss
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Samuel Russ
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
