Cases 11 - 20 of 84
Joshua Portman v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2021cv06445
Defendant:
3M Company and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Joshua Portman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. 3M Company et al
as 5:2021cv03428
Plaintiff:
Ken Allen, Jim Carter, Tom Afflixio and others
Defendant:
Archroma U.S. Inc., Chemours Company, The, Tyco Fire Products, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allen v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2021cv03431
Defendant:
Archroma U.S. Inc., Dynax Corporation, Chemours Company, The and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. Chemguard, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv03427
Defendant:
Tyco Fire Products, LP, 3M Company and Chemguard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher Rodriguez v. 3M Company et al
as 8:2020cv02347
Defendant:
AEARO Technologies LLC, DOES One Through Twenty inclusive and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Christopher Rodriguez v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv11291
Defendant:
AEARO Technologies LLC, DOES One Through Twenty inclusive and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
William Colbert v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv10997
Defendant:
3M Company, Dynax Corporation, National Foam, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
James Baird v. 3M Company et al
as 8:2020cv02301
Defendant:
3M Company, Dynax Corporation, National Foam, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James Baird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Baird v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv10995
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, National Foam, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Plaintiff:
James Baird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bingham v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2020cv02362
Defendant:
3M Company, Dynax Corporation, National Foam, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Randal Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pl
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
