Cases 81 - 90 of 383
Christopher Ray v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
as 8:2021cv01210
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Forsman v. Port of Seattle
as 2:2021cv00867
Plaintiff:
Raymond A Forsman
Defendant:
Port of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America v. Vision Quest Industries, Incorporated
as 2:2021cv05197
Defendant:
Vision Quest Industries, Incorporated and Vision Quest, Incorporated
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Pazos v. Tungsten Heavy Powder, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01140
Defendant:
Joseph Serov, Tungsten Heavy Powder, Inc. doing business as Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts, Inc., Tungsten Parts Wyoming, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
George Pazos
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Johnson v. Bay Area Health District
as 6:2021cv00837
Plaintiff:
Dawn Johnson
Defendant:
Bay Area District Hospital Auxiliary and Bay Area Health District
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Taylor v. Kaiser Permanente et al
as 3:2021cv03894
Plaintiff:
Dr. James M. Taylor and United States of America
Defendant:
Kaiser Permanente, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc., Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Mohamad v. X-Therma Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv03858
Defendant:
X-Therma Inc. and Xiaoxi Wei
Plaintiff:
Elaa Mohamad
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
United States v. Sunrhys LLC et al
as 4:2021cv05067
Respondent:
Elyssa Young and Sunrhys LLC
Petitioner:
United States
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States v. Gray
as 1:2021cv03048
Respondent:
Rick Gray
Petitioner:
United States
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
