Antitrust Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 486
Wettstein and Sons, Inc. v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. et al
as 3:2023cv01882
Defendant: Samsung SDI Co Ltd, Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd, Tatung Company of America Inc and others
Plaintiff: Wettstein and Sons, Inc on behlaf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Wettstein's
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Bonsignore Trial Lawyers, LLC, et al
as 22-16678
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION and CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellee: BONSIGNORE TRIAL LAWYERS, LLC, GRAY ECHAVARRIA, GLORIA COMEAUX and others
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 22-16532
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant: BONSIGNORE TRIAL LAWYERS, LLC, GRAY ECHAVARRIA and GLORIA COMEAUX
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 22-16537
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant: LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 22-16534
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant: COOPER & KIRKHAM, P.C.
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Flextronics International USA, v. Panasonic Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-15231
Plaintiff / Appellant: FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, PANASONIC ELECTRONIC DEVICES CO. LTD. and others
Defendant: MURATA MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., MURATA ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA, INC., MURATA POWER SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 21-15200
Defendant: LG CHEM, LTD., SONY ENERGY DEVICES CORPORATION, MAXWELL CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellee: CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS, STEVEN FRANKLYN HELFAND and MICHAEL FRANK BEDNARZ
Not Classified By Court: In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16699
Petitioner / Appellant: HARRY GARAVANIAN, CHRIS SEUFERT, KERRY MURPHY and others
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-15704
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant: ELEANOR LEWIS, Proposed Intervenor
Flextronics International USA, Inc. v. Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv00078
Defendant: Panasonic Corporation of North America, TDK Corporation, Panasonic Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Flextronics International USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?