Antitrust Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Fonseca v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01748
Plaintiff: Bryant Fonseca
Defendant: HP Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, ., HP Enterprise Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Hewlett-Packard Company v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv05371
Plaintiff: Hewlett Packard Company
Defendant: LG ELECTRONICS INC, LG Electronics U.S.A. Inc., Hitachi-LG Data Storage Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Hewlett-Packard Company v. Toshiba Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv05370
Plaintiff: Hewlett-Packard Company
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba American Information Systems Inc., Samsung Electronics Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Hewlett-Packard Company v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv06085
Plaintiff: Hewlett-Packard Company
Defendant: Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd. and Tatung Company of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hewlett-Packard Company v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv04116
Plaintiff: Hewlett-Packard Company
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America and Quanta Display Inc.
3rd_party_defendant: Toshiba Corporation , Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. , Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. and others
Movant: LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hewlett-Packard Company v. Epson Imaging Devices Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv05577
Plaintiff: Hewlett-Packard Company
Defendant: Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2010md02143
Plaintiff: Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc., Alex Afanasyev and others
Defendant: BenQ America Corp., BenQ Corporation, Hitachi, Ltd. and others
Petitioner: John Doe 1 and Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.
Other: Christopher Andrews, Debbie Bosse, Mr. Stephen Field and others
Not Yet Classified: All Parties, Amazon.com, Inc. and Apple Inc.
Intervenor: Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology and U.S. Department of J Antitrust Division
Interested Party: Patrick S. Sweeney, Gregory Starrett and Newegg Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2007md01819
Plaintiff: Michael Brooks, Rhonda L. Jacobs, Sharon Defren and others
Defendant: Renesas Technology America, Inc., Epson America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Not Yet Classified: Kyocera Wireless Corporation, Smart Modular Technologies, Inc., Extreme Networks, Inc. and others
Intervenor: David Bratton, Communication Mega-Sat Inc., Bryar Law Corporation and others
Interested Party: James B Wright and Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Special Master: Judge (Ret.) Fern M Smith and Martin Quinn
Consolidated Plaintiff: Robin McEntee
In Re: Static Random Access Memory (SRAM)
Other: Barbara Cochran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2002md01486
Plaintiff: Oracle America, Inc., Petro Computer Systems, Inc., Ashley Pritchett and others
Intervenor: Maurice Shelly, Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Patrick J. Simpson and others
Not Classified By Court: norman d palmer, Norman D. Palmer, Bryan Marcus and others
Defendant: Korea Development Bank, Hyundai Heavy Industries, Co., Ltd., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Petitioner: Unisys Corporation, JACO Electronics, Inc, All American Semiconductor Inc. and others
Not Yet Classified: Charter Township of Clinton Police & Fire Retirement System, Chemical Valley Pension Fund of West Virginia, Kimball Electronics Tampa, Inc. FKA Reptron Electronics, Inc. and others
Interested Party: Celestica Corporation
Special Master: Charles B. Renfrew
Claimant: Oak Point Partners, Inc.
Respondent: Chip-Tech, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?