Antitrust Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Yoshimoto v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff: Warren Yoshimoto, Kristin Barroga, Sean Kettley and others
Defendant: Alaska Airlines, Inc. and Alaska Air Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Loewen v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv02006
Plaintiff: Erik D. Loewen
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Boykin v. National Association of Realtors et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00340
Plaintiff: Angela Boykin
Defendant: National Association of Realtors, UMRO Realty Corp. d/b/a The Agency, Chase International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant: Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff: Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant: Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court: Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae: American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant: Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party: Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner: Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff: Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae: HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent: State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner: Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party: Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Osterhaus Pharmacy Inc v. CVS Health Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01500
Defendant: Caremark Rx LLC, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy Inc and others
Plaintiff: Osterhaus Pharmacy Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Letricia Brown v. State of California, et al
as 23-55813
Plaintiff / Appellant: LETRICIA LAVERN BROWN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Le et al v. Zuffa, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01045
Consolidated Plaintiff: Kyle Kingsbury, Mac Danzig, Dennis Lloyd Hallman and others
Plaintiff: Cung Le, Nathan Quarry and Jon Fitch
Petitioner: Geoffrey M Klineberg and Joshua D Branson
Defendant: Zuffa, LLC, Top Rank, Inc. and Robert Arum
Interested Party: Bellator Sport Worldwide LLC, WME/IMG, LLC and Sparacino, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Providence St. Joseph Health et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv03298
Plaintiff: Astera Health, Providence St. Joseph Health, UPMC and others
Defendant: Actavis Holdco US, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Rosemary D'Augusta, et al v. American Petroleum Institute, et al
as 23-15878
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROSEMARY D'AUGUSTA, BRENDA DAVIS, PAMELA FAUST and others
Defendant / Appellee: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, CHEVRONTEXACO CAPITAL CORPORATION and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?