Cases 11 - 20 of 50
David Daryl Jones v. Gabriela Vargas et al
as 2:2019cv04440
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Vargas Gabriela, Gabriela Vargas and others
Plaintiff:
David Daryl Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 2:2017cv02259
Defendant:
CTX Mortgage Company, LLC and JP Morgan Chase Bank
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NOT USED
as 2:2017cv02219
Defendant:
CTX Mortgage Company, LLC and JP Morgan Chase Bank
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Davis
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Patricia Garcia v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, et al
as 17-15682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, a national banking association and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a national banking association
Martinez v. JP Morgan Chase National Corporate Services Incorporated
as 2:2016cv03355
Plaintiff:
Jody Martinez
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garcia v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2015cv01493
Plaintiff:
Patricia Garcia
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Arthur Biederman v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02283
Plaintiff:
Arthur Biederman
Defendant:
Does, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Ashley Amirhamzeh v. Chase Bank USA, N. A.
as 14-55363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHLEY AMIRHAMZEH
Defendant - Appellee:
CHASE BANK USA, N. A., a New York corporation, Erroneously Sued As JP Morgan Chase Bank, DBA Chase Bank
Gilbert et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 3:2014cv00190
Plaintiff:
Gary Gilbert and Cindy Gilbert
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Sidney Huddleston et al v. Argent Mortgage Company LLC et al
as 2:2013cv07641
Defendant:
Ameriquest Mortgage Company, Argent Mortgage Company LLC, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Tina Cole and Sidney Huddleston
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
