Other Civil Rights Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 84
Thomas Clinton v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 10-15928
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS CLINTON
Defendant - Appellee: ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, DAVE SHAW, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr. and others
Rahinah Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-15873
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Curt-Allen: of the familyof Byron v. Lovick et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00609
Plaintiff: Curt-Allen: of the familyof Byron
Defendant: John Lovick, Richard R Smith, Laurie Towers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carolyn Jewel, et al v. NSA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-15616
Plaintiff - Appellant: CAROLYN JEWEL, TASH HEPTING, GREGORY HICKS and others
Defendant - Appellee: NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, KEITH B. ALEXANDER, Director, in his official and personal capacities, MICHAEL V. HAYDEN, in his personal capacity and others
Rahinah Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al
as 10-15352
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Defendant: JOHN BONDANELLA, an individual, US INVESTIGATIONS SERVICES, INC., a Virginia corporation, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and others
Rahinah Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al
as 10-15342
Plaintiff - Appellee: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellant: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN BONDANELLA, an individual, US INVESTIGATIONS SERVICES, INC., a Virginia corporation, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and others
Al Haramain Islamic Foundation, et al v. United States Department of th, et al
as 10-35076
Plaintiff - Appellee: AL HARAMAIN ISLAMIC FOUNDATION, INC., AKA Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc. and MULTICULTURAL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN OREGON
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL and others
Al Haramain Islamic Foundation, et al v. United States Department of th, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-35032
Plaintiff - Appellant: AL HARAMAIN ISLAMIC FOUNDATION, INC., AKA Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc. and MULTICULTURAL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN OREGON
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL and others
Montana Shooting Sports Association et al v. Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2009cv00147
Plaintiff: Montana Shooting Sports Association, Second Amendment Foundation, Inc. and Gary Marbut
Defendant: Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Type: Civil Rights None
Rahinah Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al
as 09-17160
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, am individual
Defendant - Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?